IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,705 results that match your search.25,705 results
  • Custodians are already seeing a shift away from standard fixed income collateral for phase four and five firms. They’re now concerned that international legal differences in what’s eligible will slow the process
  • Investment firms and trade associations are still holding out for an amendment to the rules which will soon catch non-systemically important firms who post either very little or no margin
  • Trade associations and central banks are lobbying regulators for an ETF-specific regulation as investors worry about being exposed to risk they did not sign up for
  • The rules aren't fully effective yet, but they're already prompting some issuers to list on alternative venues over more tightly regulated markets. As senior bankers and lawyers explain here, confusion over risk factors and registration documents, plus the potential liability of getting it wrong, is scaring market participants off
  • Thirty lawyers, regulatory strategists and market structure specialists share their views on trade and transaction reporting in part two of our special report. Respondents from banks, trading venues and APAs are divided over the true meaning of traded on a trading venue, what systematic internalisers can and can’t do and how trading venues should make their data available
  • Several banks tell us their biggest gripes with the two new investor protection regimes that are forcing an overhaul of business models, from concerns over liability to sheer scope. The rules are applied inconsistently, with some banks disagreeing over the suitability of the exact same product for nonprofessional investors - leaving a huge margin for error
  • According to banks, trading venues and lawyers, a small detail in the new directive that requires all listed securities to have a legal entity identifier is already prompting regulatory arbitrage and sending non-EU issuers to exchanges in Hong Kong, Singapore and New York
  • The new framework strengthens senior individual accountability for SFC regulated entities
  • Almost two years after implementation, in-house lawyers, bankers and buyside firms reflect on the regime's impact on deals. Call recordings have caused a particular headache with some investors reluctant to provide full feedback, infuriating bankers, but general feeling is that the true impact won't be known until markets move and pre-soundings become even more important
  • Portfolio managers want more flexibility on the type of information provided pre-pricing under the Securitisation Regulation. Here they tell Practice Insight why the rules are impossible to meet in their current form