IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,929 results that match your search.25,929 results
  • The Finance Act 2001 has, effective from assessment year 2002 to 2003, introduced specific transfer pricing regulations under the Income Tax Act 1961 (IT Act) for computing income and costs or expenses allocated or apportioned under an international transaction with an associated enterprise on an arm's length basis. Arm's length basis operates on the hypothesis that associated enterprises are independent of each other in their commercial and financial dealings. The basis for determination of whether an entity is an associated enterprise includes participation, whether directly or indirectly, by an enterprise in the capital, control or management of another enterprise. Where an enterprise is in a position to influence, restrain or regulate the other, the two entities are considered associated enterprises. An international transaction is defined as a transaction between two or more associated enterprises, either or both of them non-residents, involving a purchase, sale, lease, provision of services, lending, borrowing or any transaction having a bearing on profits, income, loss or assets of such enterprises.
  • On August 29 2001, the Australian government announced several amendments to its interest withholding tax (IWT) exemption regime which are intended to enhance Australia's development as a centre for financial services in the Asia-Pacific region.
  • By means of the Circular Letter No 10 of August 6 2001, the Superintendency of Industry and Trade (Colombian Competition Authority) stated new terms and conditions for the approval of integrations, mergers and acquisitions.
  • National Monetary Council Resolution No 2,878, recently issued by the Brazilian Central Bank, rules on relations between banks and their clients with regard to the services and products offered to the latter.
  • Bank clients desiring to transfer their bank assets in the event of death to certain persons outside of regular inheritance proceedings often approach their bank with the idea of granting a power over their assets that will become effective only on the death of the grantor. Swiss banks refuse to accept such powers because, under Swiss law, this would be considered a matter of inheritance laws requiring the mandatory form of a testament. On the other hand, Swiss law recognizes a power of attorney granted with immediate effect and remaining in effect after the death of the grantor (post mortem power). Such a power does not require a testamentary form. This type of power has until now frequently been used as a means of estate planning, although its obvious disadvantage is that the beneficiary of the power can dispose of the assets already during the life time of the grantor.
  • Under Italian legislation local authorities can determine the conditions and the structure of their debt and can operate according to discretionary powers, although this must be in compliance with the general conditions provided by law.
  • Bär & Karrer Seefeldstrasse 19
  • Since the beginning of 2001, the diverse nature of the structured finance transactions carried out both in and through Ireland has increased dramatically. Many of these transactions are notable for the cutting edge nature of the structures implemented.
  • Switzerland’s independence and local laws have helped make it a major financial centre, but now it wants to be more like its EU neighbours. By wanting to have its cake and eat it, will Switzerland and its lawyers suffer a bad case of indigestion? Thomas Williams reports from Zurich
  • At a time when the UK economy needs every trick in the book to stay healthy, a weakened securitization market would be a serious blow. In this month’s IFLR, Ian Field and Jennifer Marshall of Allen & Overy, London, argue that just such a blow could be about to land. The proposed UK law on insolvency will, they say, create confusion over the right of secured creditors in structured finance issues to appoint a receiver. Without this, such deals would become almost impossible