IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,766 results that match your search.25,766 results
  • French regulators aim to increase the liability of banks in tender offers. But new rules leave questions unanswered. By Eric Cafritz and Omer Tene of Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson
  • Jennifer Marshall of Allen & Overy explains what Europe's new rules mean for companies and investors
  • Significant legislation in Mexico sets out to protect the process of competition, through the prevention and elimination of monopolies and monopolistic practices and any other restraints of trade. It is applicable to all economic participants involved in the Mexican economy and commercial banks, financial institutions and foreign corporations should be aware that some commercial practices, formerly tolerated in Mexico, might now be illegal under these rules and regulations. The legislation was first enacted on December 24 1992 in the form of the Mexican Antitrust Act (Ley Federal de Competencia Económica, the MAA). Additional procedural regulations were published on March 1998, with the enactment of the Regulations to the Mexican Antitrust Act (Reglamento de la Ley de Competencia Económica, the RMAA).
  • When KPNQwest bought parts of troubled Global TeleSystems the companies agreed bankruptcy terms with creditors before the deal closed. Steven C Planchard of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton explains how
  • The UK's Company Law Review Steering Group (the Steering Group) has set out its final proposals for making the law regarding corporate governance – the duties of directors and shareholders and the balance of power between them – more precise and easier to understand, and has suggested areas in which the current position could be improved. Its main conclusions and recommendations in this area are dealt with below.
  • Brazilian financial institutions can now enter into credit derivative agreements to transfer risks relating to credits to each other. These credits may be the result of loans, financing or lease contracts, securities, guarantees, credit derivatives or other financial or commercial contracts implying credit risks, negotiated on the domestic market. The financial institutions must make a commitment to keeping a technically-capable manager responsible for the credit derivatives before the Central Bank of Brazil. This comes about as a result of the Central Bank enacting Circular 3.106 regulating credit derivative transactions on April 10 2002. This had previously been authorized by the National Monetary Council's Resolution 2.933 of February 28 2002.
  • On April 3 2002, it was announced that the government of the British Virgin Islands (BVI) has reached an agreement with the Organization of Economic Corporation and Development (OECD) concerning the OECD's initiative on Harmful Tax Competition and Tax Havens.
  • On March 15 2002, The Bahamas formally replied to the OECD Forum on harmful tax practices and issued a commitment to cooperate with the OECD in its harmful tax practices initiative. This initiative seeks transparency and exchange of information, on request, for tax purposes. The OECD proposes mechanisms and deadlines for achievement of these objectives, including a mechanism for the exchange of information relating to criminal tax offences by 2004, and civil tax defaults by 2006.
  • Canada's courts have recently introduced new uncertainties to the country's mergers and acquisitions regime with decisions regarding the acquisition (by way of a plan of arrangement) of Pacifica Papers by Norske Skog Canada Limited. While almost 74% of Pacifica's shareholders voted in favour of the arrangement, the transaction was opposed by two minority shareholders (the dissident shareholders), which together held 20% of the shares.
  • The Korean government has recently proposed an easing of the regulations governing foreign investment zones (FIZs) in an effort to encourage more multinational companies to establish regional headquarters in Korea.