IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,965 results that match your search.25,965 results
  • Sweeping changes to Dutch governance regime Hans Sachse and Aravind Ramanna of Boekel De Nerée N.V. provide an overview of the Dutch corporate governance structure, outline the Tabaksblat committee proposals and discuss legislative initiatives in the field of corporate governance
  • An overview of directors' liability in Indonesia Directors of new companies need to ensure that they're not held liable for actions carried out in the company's formation that they had no say over. By Dezi Kirana and Mufti Habriansyah of Soemadipradja & Taher
  • Compliance, risk management and internal controls Robert Bostrom of Winston & Strawn discusses the evolving roles and responsibilities of boards of directors and audit committees
  • What the James Hardie inquiry means for Australian corporates A special commission of inquiry into the asbestos-related compensation issues faced by the James Hardie Group highlights a need for corporate law reform. Dean Jordan and John Elliott of Clayton Utz explain
  • May 2004 saw Europe's big bang in the area of competition law, with the modernization of competition law enforcement and changes to merger regulation and rules for technology transfer. At the same time, 10 new member states joined the Union, bringing them under the EU's competition regime.
  • UK regulators: seeking useful changes in the bond markets The UK's Financial Services Authority (FSA) is launching a new round of bond market scrutiny with a roundtable and possible review of regulation.
  • Outsourcing in an industry as highly regulated as financial services creates its own set of difficulties, explain Jonathan Herbst and Mathew Rutter
  • Under Delaware law, directors can be liable if they fail to get a fair deal for shareholders when companies go private. David Leinwand and David Moss examine two cases with contrasting outcomes for the defendants
  • On April 21 2004, a special working group called the Code Group presented a proposal for a Swedish code of corporate governance. The Code Group consists of representatives from the Government Commission on Business Confidence and representatives of listed companies, investors and the Stockholm Stock Exchange.
  • The issuance in July of the much-anticipated request for proposal (RFP) for the independent water and power project (IWPP) at Shouaiba (in western Saudi Arabia, near Jeddah) is creating a new template for project financing as the move toward privatization of power and water production in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia begins in earnest. At stake under the RFP is a 60% interest in the project company that will develop, own and operate the oil-fired plant.