MREL rules could derail progress of challenger banks

Author: Olly Jackson | Published: 3 Sep 2018

The minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) is creating a cliff-edge for challenger banks, forcing them to hold the same level of capital as HSBC and Barclays.

Currently, banks that have between £15 billion ($19.4 billion) and £25 billion in risk weighted assets (RWAs), and between 40,000 and 80,000 transactional accounts are required to hold MREL that can be bailed in should a bank fail.

"This approach to setting MREL creates a cliff-edge effect as there is no proportionality in terms of size or business model," said Simon Hills, director of prudential policy at UK Finance.  

This is exacerbated for banks using the more conservative standardised approach to calculating credit risk RWAs compared to those on the internal ratings based approach.

According to Hills, a solution to this could be to increase the MREL threshold or to allow it to be set on a...


 

 

close Register today to read IFLR's global coverage

Get unlimited access to IFLR.com for 7 days*, including the latest regulatory developments in the global financial sector, updated daily.

  • Deal Analysis
  • Expert Opinion
  • Best Practice

register

*all IFLR's global coverage published in the last 3 months.

Read IFLR's global coverage whenever and wherever you want for 7 days with IFLR mobile app for iPad and iPhone

"The format of the Review has changed over the years; the high quality of its substantive content has not."
Lee C Buchheit, Cleary Gottlieb

register