European Capital Markets Forum

A lot to talk about

June 01, 2009


Europe's top lawyers and banks had an immense range of proposed regulation, crisis management and legal structures to debate at this year's Capital Markets Forum in London

Elizabeth Fournier, Nick Pettifer
Staff writers

The first topic of debate at the Forum was the proposed alternative investment directive. Panllists argued that the European Commission is ignoring proper process and rushing knee-jerk regulation through the legislature. The draft directive will lose effectiveness as a result.

"The broad regulation agenda has been dropped very quickly. The idea was that there would be an initial consultation, then a consultation on how best to proceed and then legislation," said Christopher Bates, partner at Clifford Chance. "The middle section has disappeared; it happened with ratings agencies and now it is happening with hedge funds."

The panel also remembered the Prospectus Directive as a similar situation. At the time, the fear was that the Commission was more concerned with keeping to its schedule than it was to ensuring the regulation was effective.

"They are throwing the net broadly to identify funds with systemic risk," said...




It was an aggressive view, but it's good news for defendants in future subprime litigation

A US lawyer on the importance of the Fortis class action case

Web seminars

US and EU hybrid capital
February 3 2010
The future of hybrids, in a popular discussion between IFLR, Morrison & Foerster and Calyon

Latest Issue

March 2010

Basel III: The revenge of Basel
New Basel rules are affecting everyone differently. In the UK banks are worried about grandfathering, in Germany the headache is hybrids and in the US it's risk structures. Meanwhile Japan has some tips and Hong Kong structured its first hybrid [more]