Toxic tactics compared

Author: | Published: 1 May 2009

Elizabeth Fournier and Kyle Siskey
Staff writers, London and New York

“The tricky part is definitely how one decides what qualifies as toxic, and how to price it”
Norbert Wiederholt, Allen & Overy, Frankfurt

Putting a price on illiquid assets is a delicate balancing act, and one that financial ministers seem desperate to avoid. German ministers meeting as IFLR went to press failed to reach a formal agreement on how to tackle the estimated €300 billion ($388 billion) of impaired assets held by the country's biggest banks.

The US Treasury's Public-Private Investment Programme (P-Pip) seems to offer a viable solution on paper, by involving private investors in a public sale to determine value. But banks are reluctant to participate in another government plan that could impose restrictions on their operations. The Irish government meanwhile looks set to be following suit by pledging to buy property assets, and the UK...

Upcoming events

  • 22feb

    Asia M&A Forum

    Island Shangri-La Hotel, Hong Kong February February 22-23 2012

Web seminars

Proposed US offering reforms
March 8, 2012
4.00 pm GMT