The Indian private equity scenario has undergone a sea change
over the last five years or so. There has been a considerable
interest, both domestic as well as international, in the private
equity sector which is evident from the fact that the total private
equity funds (more commonly understood in the Indian context as
venture capital funds (VCF)) committed to investments in India has
increased exponentially. The following table gives the statistics
of growth of the venture capital industry in India.
|
Year |
US $
million |
| 1996 |
20 |
| 1997 |
80 |
| 1998 |
150 |
| 1999 |
320 |
| 2000 |
750 |
| 2001* |
1200 |
| 2008* |
10000 |
*estimates
Source: NASSCOM: Study on Indian Capital Industry
Though these numbers may not look substantial when compared to
funds committed in other countries like the US and Israel, they go
a long way in demonstrating the rise of private equity investments
in India.
Structuring of venture capital funds
Structuring of private equity or venture capital funds in India
requires special considerations from the regulatory and tax
perspective. This article endeavours to demystify the legal and
regulatory concerns surrounding the private equity funds in
India.
Domestic funds
For domestic venture funds (in which the funds are raised within
India), the structure that is most commonly used is that of a
domestic vehicle for the pooling of funds from the investors and a
separate investment adviser for carrying on asset management
activities. For the domestic vehicle, there are two options viz a
trust or a company. India at present does not have a limited
partnership structure which is a common choice in countries like
the US.
The 'trust' structure has been more commonly used since the
company structure does have some drawbacks mostly arising from the
provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 which may conflict with some
of the basic underlying principles of venture capital investments.
Some of these concerns are:
- Difficulty in return of capital: Redemption of securities
by companies (ie buyback of securities) can be made only out of
profits or proceeds of a fresh issue of securities.
Furthermore, the buyback of securities by a company in any one
financial year is restricted to a maximum of 25% of its total
paid-up capital. This restriction restrains the ability of a
venture capital company to return the capital to its investors
if the investments made by it are sold at a loss.
- Difficulty in distributing returns: A company can declare
dividends only if the company has profits. There are also
statutory requirements whereby if the dividends declared are
more than 10% of the par value (ie nominal value) of the
shares, a certain portion of the distributable profits would
have to be transferred to general reserve.
- Difficulty in termination: At the time of termination of
the fund, if the fund is structured as a company, winding up
procedures are extremely time consuming and also requires high
court approval. This could make the winding up process quite
cumbersome.
Though some of the above shortcomings of the 'company' structure
can be addressed by carefully structuring the investment
instruments, Indian venture capitalists have found the 'trust'
structure to be more favourable as it offers them more
flexibility.
Offshore funds
Commonly there are two alternatives available to offshore
investors participating in Indian venture capital investments. The
offshore investors can either use an 'offshore structure' or a
'unified structure'.
Offshore structure
Under this structure an investment vehicle, which could be a LLC
or an LP organized in a jurisdiction outside India, makes
investments directly into Indian portfolio companies. There would
generally be an offshore manager for managing the assets of the
fund and an investment advisor in India for identifying deals and
to carry out preliminary due-diligence on prospective investment
opportunities. The structure is depicted in figure 1.
Unified structure
This structure is generally used where domestic (ie Indian)
investors are expected to participate in the fund. Under this
structure, a trust or a company is organized in India. The domestic
investors would directly contribute to the trust whereas overseas
investors pool their investments in an offshore vehicle and this
offshore vehicle invests in the domestic trust. The portfolio
investments are made by the trust. The trust would generally have a
domestic manager or an adviser. The offshore fund may also have its
own offshore manager/adviser. This structure also enables the
domestic manager to draw its share of carry directly from the
trust. The structure is depicted in figure 2.
The regulatory framework
In India, both domestic and offshore venture capital funds
investing in India are regulated by the Securities and Exchange
Board of India (SEBI). Until recently, SEBI only regulated the
domestic VCFs vide its SEBI (Venture Capital Funds) Regulations,
1996 (as amended by SEBI (Venture Capital Funds (Amendment))
Regulations 2000) (VCF Regulations). However, in September 2000,
SEBI announced a new set of guidelines enabling foreign venture
capital and private equity investors to register with itself. The
new guidelines are called the SEBI (Foreign Venture Capital
Investors) Regulations, 2000 (FVCI Regulations).
The SEBI (Venture Capital Funds) Regulations,
1996
Under the VCF Regulations, a venture capital fund can be
organized either in the form of a trust or as a company. Though the
guidelines do not appear to make registration with SEBI mandatory,
SEBI has made its intention clear to regulate all domestic
VCFs.
The VCFs are permitted to invest only in venture capital
undertakings (VCUs) which are not engaged in activities which have
been classified under the negative list which broadly includes
undertakings engaged in real estate business, non-banking financial
services, gold financing etc. Furthermore, the VCU has to be a
domestic company whose shares are not listed on a recognized stock
exchange which means that domestic VCFs are not permitted to invest
in securities of foreign companies.
Eligibility criteria
For registering as a VCF, the VCF Regulations, require, inter
alia, that:
- the main objective of the VCF (whether a company or a
trust) should be to carry on the activity of a venture capital
fund;
- the constituting documents (memorandum and articles of
association in the case of a company and the trust deed in case
of a trust) should contain a prohibition from making an
invitation to the public to subscribe to its securities.
However, it should be noted that VCF Regulations do permit
domestic VCFs to list their securities after a period of 3
years from the date of issuance of these securities;
and
- in the case of a trust seeking registration, the
eligibility criteria prescribed requires that, the instrument
of trust should be registered under the provisions of the
Registration Act, 1908 of India.
Investment conditions and
restrictions
SEBI has prescribed certain investment restrictions on the VCF
both in terms of acceptance of contributions as well as for making
downline investments in portfolio companies. These are as
follows:
- Minimum investment to be accepted from any investor should
be Rs 500,000 (approximately $11,500) except in the case of
employees, principal officers or directors of the VCF,
employees of the manager of the VCF where lower amounts may be
accepted.
- Minimum firm capital commitments from its investors should
be Rs 50 million.
- A VCF is not permitted to invest more than 25% of its
corpus in any one VCU and atleast 75% of its investible funds
are required to be invested in unlisted equity shares or equity
linked instruments: Provided, if the VCF wants to gain the tax
benefits, it will have to exit from such investments within a
period of one year from the date of listing of the shares of
the VCUs on a recognized stock exchange in India.
- A VCF may also invest up to 25% of its investible funds by
way of: (i) subscription to an initial public offering of a VCU
whose shares are proposed to be listed on a recognized stock
exchange subject to a lock in period of one year; or (ii) in
debt or debt instruments of a VCU in which it has already made
an investment by way of equity.
- A VCF is also not permitted to invest in associated
companies which have been defined to mean companies which
exercise control over the VCF or where VCF exercises control
over the companies.
The mandatory exit clause in respect of unlisted investments has
generated very strong negative reactions among the venture capital
community in India and overseas and have demanded that in order to
foster growth of venture capital industry in India, such
restrictive clauses should be removed from the VCF Regulations. The
Finance Minister has also made press statements in which he has
indicated that this clause will be deleted in the near future.
The SEBI (Foreign Venture Capital Investor)
Regulations, 2000
An FVCI has been defined under the FVCI Regulations to mean an
investor incorporated or established outside India, which proposes
to make investments in venture capital fund(s) or venture capital
undertakings in India and is registered under these
Regulations.
Unlike the VCF Regulations which seem to make it mandatory for
VCFs to register with the SEBI, the FVCI Regulations does not make
it mandatory for an offshore venture capital investor to register
with SEBI as an FVCI. Also, the SEBI's intention is really not to
regulate the FVCIs but to monitor the foreign investments coming
into the domestic venture capital sector.
Eligibility criteria
In order to determine the eligibility of an applicant, SEBI
would consider, inter alia, the applicant's track record,
professional competence, financial soundness, experience, whether
the applicant is regulated by an appropriate foreign regulatory
authority or is an income tax payer or submits a certificate from
its banker of its or its promoter's track record where the
applicant is neither a regulated entity nor an income tax payer.
The applicant can be a pension pund, mutual fund, investment trust,
investment company, investment partnership, asset management
company, endowment fund, university fund, charitable institution or
any other investment vehicle incorporated and established outside
India.
Investment conditions and
restrictions
The investment restrictions applicable to FVCI are similar to
those applicable to VCFs under the VCF Regulations (as listed
above) except for the following:
- no minimum corpus or capital commitment requirement for
FVCIs;
- no minimum individual contribution prescribed under the
FVCI Regulations;
- no mandatory exit clause in respect of investments by an
FVCI in unlisted securities; and
- for determining the maximum investment in a single VCU (ie
25% of the corpus), the funds earmarked for India will be taken
into consideration.
The FVCI Regulations make it mandatory for a FVCI to appoint a
domestic custodian for the purpose of custody of securities and for
entering into an arrangement with a designated bank for the purpose
of opening a special non-resident Indian rupee or foreign currency
account. SEBI acts as a nodal agency for all necessary approvals
including the permission of the Reserve Band of India for opening
of the bank account.
In addition to the above investment conditions and restrictions,
there are certain reporting and disclosure requirements that need
to be satisfied by a registered FVCI on an continuing basis.
Taxation
Domestic VCFs
Domestic VCFs are entitled to tax benefits under Section
10(23FB) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (ITA). As per this section,
any income earned by a SEBI registered VCF (which could be a trust
or a company) set up to raise funds for investment in a venture
capital undertaking is exempt from tax. This section has to be read
with Section 115U of the IT Act which gives SEBI registered VCFs a
pass-through status whereby the investors in the VCF are directly
taxed on any income distributed by the VCFs as though the investors
have made direct investment in the portfolio companies. The
taxation of such income in the hands of the investors will depend
on the nature of income which will remain the same as in the hands
of the VCFs. The taxability of income in the hands of the investors
based on the nature of income are summarized in figure 3.
 |
The above tax rates may be reduced under Double Taxation
Avoidance Treaty (Tax Treaty) between India and the foreign country
in which the investors are residing.
FVCI
There is no specific tax exemption available for the income
earned by a FVCI. However, the way the Section 10(23FB) is worded,
there is a possibility that even the FVCI would be entitled to the
benefits available to domestic VCFs mentioned above. In the event
that the FVCI avails of the exemption under Section 10(23FB), the
investors in a FVCI would become liable to tax on the income earned
by the FVCI as per the provisions of Section 115U.
As per the provisions of Section 90(2) of the ITA, a
non-resident investor investing from a country with which India has
a tax treaty, would have an option to be taxed as per the
provisions of the tax treaty or ITA, whichever is more beneficial.
In light of this, the FVCI investing through a tax treaty
jurisdiction may be in a position to elect to take tax benefits
available under the tax treaty in which case the Sections 10(23FB)
and Section 115U of the ITA should not be applicable. For example,
if the FVCI is incorporated in Mauritius, the Indian capital gains
tax on the income earned by the FVCI on its investments in India
can be eliminated under the India-Mauritius Tax Treaty provided the
FVCI does not have a "permanent establishment" in India. The
investors in FVCI may also not be taxable in India.
On account of its favourable tax treaty with India, Mauritius
has become a favourite jurisdiction for investing into India. As a
matter of fact, Mauritius has become the largest investor into
India. In order to structure the FVCI through Mauritius and in
order to be eligible to avail the benefit under the India-Mauritius
Tax Treaty, careful structuring is extremely crucial. There have
been instances in the past where the use of Mauritius as a conduit
for investing into India has been looked upon unfavourably by the
Indian tax authorities. In the case of NatWest, the Authority for
Advance Rulings (AAR) had denied a ruling on the grounds that use
of Mauritius was merely for tax avoidance and the AAR need not rule
on an application which is prima facie for avoidance of tax.
However, careful structuring of an investment can reduce the risk
of denial of Tax Treaty benefits. There has been a ruling in case
of AIG followed by DLJ, wherein the AAR granted the benefits of
India-Mauritius Tax Treaty and observed that if there was a
commercial justification for setting up an SPV and then if the same
was established in Mauritius, that per se should not result in
denial of a ruling and benefits under the India-Mauritius Tax
Treaty. In addition to the commercial justification, it is also
important to ensure that the structure does not expose the FVCI to
a "permanent establishment" (PE) in India. Under the
India-Mauritius Tax Treaty, if the FVCI were held to have a PE in
India, the income attributable to such PE would be subject to tax
in India. There is a fair amount of subjectivity involved in the
determination of a PE and hence very careful thought has to be
given while finalizing structure, especially to the management of
the FVCI.
Conclusion
The venture capital regime is still evolving and the government
is quite upbeat on the future prospects of the venture capital
industry in India. India continues to offer great investment
opportunities in the knowledge sectors and these sectors are likely
to attract lot more venture capital funds, both domestic and
offshore. The regulators have also made their intentions clear that
they are willing to go an extra mile to facilitate such inflow of
venture capital investments into the country. As per the
projections made by National Association of Software Services
Companies, by year 2008 the total venture capital inflow into India
is likely to touch $10 billion. For venture capital investors, this
may be the opportune time to look at India as an attractive
investment destination.
Nishith Desai
93-95, B Mittal Court
Nariman Point
Mumbai 400 021
India
Tel: 91 22 282 0609
Fax: 91 22 287 5792
www.nishithdesai.com