Why Elektrim may be welcome news for trustees

June 01, 2005


The House of Lords has ruled in the Elektrim bondholder litigation that the trustee to the deal must accelerate debt if asked to do so by bondholders, but should not be liable for the results if the acceleration is shown to be invalid. By Daniel Whitehead

The opinion of the UK's highest court of appeal in the Elektrim litigation may bring welcome clarification of the responsibility and liability of bond trustees when accelerating debt.

The case came to the UK courts because Law Debenture Trust, acting as trustee on €510 million ($643 million) of Polish telecoms company Elektrim's bonds, declined to accelerate the bonds at the request of the bondholder unless indemnified by the bondholders against potential losses if the acceleration was deemed to be invalid.

The litigation began in the High Court, which determined that an event of default that was materially prejudicial to the bondholders had occurred. Elektrim claimed that acceleration under its bonds would result in a significant loss to the company (which the High Court quantified as perhaps being in excess of €800 million). Law Debenture feared that it could be liable for this amount and, being entitled under the...



Related articles

"The culture is not to disclose. And that’s partly driven by the rules"

The SFC's Martin Wheatley on the problem of disclosure in Hong Kong

Web seminars

US and EU hybrid capital
February 3 2010
The future of hybrids, in a popular discussion between IFLR, Morrison & Foerster and Calyon

Latest Issue

March 2010

Basel III: The revenge of Basel
New Basel rules are affecting everyone differently. In the UK banks are worried about grandfathering, in Germany the headache is hybrids and in the US it's risk structures. Meanwhile Japan has some tips and Hong Kong structured its first hybrid [more]