Why Spectrum Plus is bad news for banks

August 01, 2005


The House of Lords has reversed Siebe Gorman, the landmark case on establishing a fixed charge, meaning that there is no longer a simple way for a clearing bank to take an effective fixed charge on book debts. By Geoffrey Yeowart

The House of Lords has decided, in the test case of National Westminster Bank plc v Spectrum Plus Limited, that a general charge taken on a company's book debts by a clearing bank in a debenture is effective only as a floating charge, where the proceeds are paid into the company's current account with the bank. They concluded that the charge holder in Spectrum had not exercised enough control over the proceeds to sustain a fixed charge.

This overrules the unanimous decision of the Court of Appeal in Spectrum and the decision of Slade J in Siebe Gorman Limited v Barclays Bank Limited in 1979. The Siebe Gorman decision had been relied on for more than 25 years as authority that such a debenture was effective to create a fixed charge. The new decision is estimated to affect the way in which book debt proceeds will be distributed...



"The culture is not to disclose. And that’s partly driven by the rules"

The SFC's Martin Wheatley on the problem of disclosure in Hong Kong

Web seminars

US and EU hybrid capital
February 3 2010
The future of hybrids, in a popular discussion between IFLR, Morrison & Foerster and Calyon

Latest Issue

March 2010

Basel III: The revenge of Basel
New Basel rules are affecting everyone differently. In the UK banks are worried about grandfathering, in Germany the headache is hybrids and in the US it's risk structures. Meanwhile Japan has some tips and Hong Kong structured its first hybrid [more]