Spread too thin?

Author: | Published: 1 Aug 2007

In his recent Mansion House speech Mervyn King, the governor of the Bank of England, focused on some of the concerns surrounding investment in CDOs and the structural implications for the financial system of their increasing prevalence. Some of those concerns may be overplayed.

Historically, CDO-squared transactions have come in for the most criticism. These instruments pool together a portfolio of underlying CDO transactions in certain circumstances, magnifying the effects of a default that might be present in more than one of the underlying CDOs. This can create a precipice effect, because a single default can have a catastrophic effect on a CDO-squared transaction, multiplying loss to the structure. There has been criticism of lemming-like behaviour in the investor base where, in a low-spread environment, investors have sought to increase their returns by investing in these riskier portfolios. Concerns over CDO-squared transactions have been exacerbated recently because many deals have...



close Register today to read IFLR's global coverage

Get unlimited access to IFLR.com for 7 days*, including the latest regulatory developments in the global financial sector, updated daily.

  • Deal Analysis
  • Expert Opinion
  • Best Practice


*all IFLR's global coverage published in the last 3 months.

Read IFLR's global coverage whenever and wherever you want for 7 days with IFLR mobile app for iPad and iPhone

"The format of the Review has changed over the years; the high quality of its substantive content has not."
Lee C Buchheit, Cleary Gottlieb