International transparency

The same rules for everyone

February 01, 2008


The sub-prime crisis and Enron were created by the same lack of transparency. International cooperation is the only way to solve it

The sub-prime crisis showed that financial markets require much greater transparency. Incomplete loan credit analysis, faulty disclosure of lending terms and the questionable practices of credit-rating agencies caused the crisis; securitisation of complex financial products, an opaque financial architecture of off-balance-sheet structured investment vehicles (SIVs), shadow-banking, and bad auditing practices also played a part. Contributors to the situation inflicted the damage on themselves. They would have benefited from greater transparency. In the Financial Times David Pitt-Watson suggested that "the lessons of the credit crisis are not just for regulators. The failures that caused the current credit crisis are the same ones that brought down Enron, Worldcom and Parmalat: lack of accountability, lack of responsibility, and lack of transparency."

Clarity is needed Transparency has become a central issue in financial law. It has several elements: know-your-customer obligations for financial institutions and other service providers; financial institutions' and other service providers' disclosure of...




Related articles

The regulators haven’t mitigated counterparty risk yet, just changed it

Simon Dodds, general counsel at Deutsche Bank, on forcing derivatives through central counterparties

Web seminars

US and EU hybrid capital
February 3 2010
The future of hybrids, in a popular discussion between IFLR, Morrison & Foerster and Calyon

Latest Issue

March 2010

Basel III: The revenge of Basel
New Basel rules are affecting everyone differently. In the UK banks are worried about grandfathering, in Germany the headache is hybrids and in the US it's risk structures. Meanwhile Japan has some tips and Hong Kong structured its first hybrid [more]