IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,956 results that match your search.25,956 results
  • Takuya Sonoda In 2014, the Japanese Diet agreed to amend, in two stages, the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations. This was following a series of scandals in which the menus used at a number of famous hotels and restaurants in Japan were found to be misleading, listing ingredients not actually used in the dishes. First, the Act for Partial Amendment of the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations (Law 71 of 2014) was promulgated on June 6 2014 and came into force on December 1 2014. This amendment introduced the requirement that business operators take all necessary measures to ensure the accuracy of all representations made to customers, including the establishment of appropriate managerial systems. Prime Minister Abe, on November 14 2014, oversaw the publication of guidelines to this amendment, setting out the fundamental policies of the amendment and listing specific examples of measures that must be taken by business operators in Japan.
  • Recently there have been some notable rulings by Mauritian courts. The first is Crociani and others v Crociani and others and Princess Camilla de Bourboun des Deux Siciles. In the trust deed in question, the relevant part of clause 12 stated: 'thereafter, the rights of all persons and the construction and effect of each and every provision hereof shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of and construed only according to the law of the said country which shall become the forum for administration of the trusts'.
  • José Miguel Puiggrós Gabriela Dañino Although Peru has a strong track record in developing infrastructure projects, it still has one of the largest infrastructure deficits in the region. There are many projects in different sectors of the economy that have been granted more than $12 billion by the Peruvian government between 2013 and 2014, which are expected to obtain financing and begin construction during 2015. Many of these projects will be financed under co-financed schemes, which will require the granting of government credit enhancements. A stable legal framework aimed at promoting private investment in large scale infrastructure projects, and a steady positive macroeconomic performance, have contributed to the development and bankability of infrastructure projects in Peru. Specifically, credit enhancement schemes granted by the government have played a leading role in attracting both investment and financing sources for this type of project. However, such schemes have evolved since the first projects, where they were incorporated as part of the financing structure.
  • Tolga Çabakli Isil Ökten In May 2014, a new paragraph was added to the Capital Movements Circular (issued by the Central Bank of Turkey (CBT)) that limits the loans between a financial institution or entity residing outside Turkey (Foreign Lender) and a company residing in Turkey (Turkish Borrower). According to the Circular, a Foreign Lender and Turkish Borrower can not to enter into a loan agreement that: (i) entitles a Turkish Borrower to utilise and repay the facilities on different dates subject to loan limit, (ii) does not include a specified term, (iii) includes a floating interest rate generally, and (iv) works as a debtor's current account (revolving). Upon a further amendment in November 2014, it was been made clear that this provision does not apply to the banks or leasing, factoring and financing institutions, but only to Turkish companies. Despite the lack of any official guidance on this issue, it's understood that the underlying reason behind the change is CBT's intention to ensure that each loan is properly recorded, and to identify the term of each loan so that the applicable taxes can be calculated accordingly. More specifically, the intention of this legislation is to come up with a loan agreement or similar document evidencing each drawdown under a revolving facility agreement. Further, if the Turkish Borrower reaches the total limit specified in the revolving facility, this agreement would be deemed to have been exhausted, and a new credit limit should be opened through a new loan agreement. Each and every loan agreement, including those evidencing the drawdown, should be reported by the intermediary Turkish bank to the CBT. The amendment would prevent the foreign re-borrowings (in respect of the repaid loans) made under a revolving facility exceeding the limit initially agreed and notified to the CBT even if certain portion of such loan is repaid.
  • A new law came into force on January 1 2015, intended to protect and motivate whistleblowers. A whistleblower is a natural person who, in good faith, reports something they learn of while at work, that could significantly help to expose activities that are against the public interest. A report is made in good faith if the whistleblower, considering the facts of which he is aware and considering his knowledge, is convinced that what he is reporting is accurate. Apart from the enumerated exceptions (such as the protection of classified information, bank secrets and legal services), public interest reports and disclosures are not considered a breach of confidentiality. The primary goal of the law is to protect the whistleblower from retaliation by the employer. An employer can make a legal act or issue a decision relating to the protected whistleblower only with the consent of the whistleblower or with the prior consent of the labour inspectorate. The consent of the labour inspectorate is not required if the employer's act confers a right on the employee or if it is in relation to termination of employment not associated with the employer's evaluation. The labour inspectorate will grant the employer consent for the proposed act toward the protected whistleblower only if the employer can demonstrate that the proposed act has no connection to the report. If the employer cannot demonstrate this, the labour inspectorate will not grant consent. The legal act will be invalid without the prior consent of the labour inspectorate.
  • Clifford Chance’s Francis Edwards, Terry Yang and Yasuyuki Takayami explain why the global requirement can clash with local confidentiality obligations
  • As 2015's debt markets heave into life, European high yield's ceaseless covenant war continues. The pushing and pulling over change of control provisions, restricted payment baskets and their ilk is detailed in our annual high yield special focus on page 51.
  • With shareholder activism likely to make this proxy season a hot one, IFLR asks what companies should prioritise to best prepare
  • A new UK framework designed to hold parties to their promises means care must be taken before making statements in the course of a takeover battle
  • Shenzhen-based property developer Kaisa's recent default has drawn renewed attention to the nuances of cross-default clauses in loans, bonds and derivatives.