Search results for

Rashid Bahar The Federal Council opened on November 28 2014 a consultation on a major modernisation of Swiss corporate law. The draft bill aims, on the one hand, to implement on a statutory level the requirements of article 95 (3) of the federal constitution resulting from the so-called fat-cat initiative that was adopted. On the other, it aims to re-initiate a series of reforms that were launched in 2007, but that were put on hold shortly after to focus on the fat-cat initiative. As the consultation period closes, we consider the key proposals of the draft bill. Overall, the draft bill on the modernisation of Swiss corporate law is a vast one, covering a diverse range of issues; some pundits have called it a mammoth bill.

Anthony Dee Patricia Paz Republic Act No 9184, or the Government Procurement Reform Act (GPRA), took effect on January 26 2003. The GPRA covers all stages of procurement of infrastructure projects, goods, and consulting services by all branches and instrumentalities of government. The GPRA establishes a two-tier protest mechanism to challenge a public procurement tender before an award. In order to exhaust this internal protest procedure, a bidder must first file a request for reconsideration with the procuring entity's Bids and Awards Committee (BAC). The BAC's denial of the request may be protested in writing to the head of the procuring entity upon payment of a non-refundable fee. The decision of the head of the procuring entity is final, such that the bidder may only avail itself of judicial review upon completion of protests and only on the ground of grave abuse of discretion. Arguably, this legal framework does not provide an expedient system for independent complaints review. Meeting the timeframes provided under the law for protest resolution is a challenge for many procuring entities, and the absence of independent and expert review undermines, to a certain degree, the legitimacy and credibility of any protest resolution.

Anna Pinedo Regulators and lawmakers in the US continue to review and consider measures that may promote capital formation for smaller and emerging companies. Although the number of initial public offerings (IPOs) in the US in 2014 reached highs not seen since the early 2000s, there are a few important observations. Companies continue to rely heavily on private financings and only pursue IPOs once they have attained a significant size or maturity. Often, institutional investors participate in private placements that almost serve as surrogates for traditional IPOs as the size of pre-public, later stage private placements has grown significantly. The median size of IPOs remains high – there are relatively few IPOs in which the offering proceeds are less than $100 million. This dynamic has resulted in a need to ensure that there are more liquidity opportunities for the holders of securities in privately held companies.

Thai law governing surety and mortgages is found in the Civil and Commercial Code (CCC) and has been relatively stable over the years. However, the amendments described in our November 2014 briefing are already out of date.

The lighter side of the past month in the world of financial law

The EBA and FSB may be pressured to relax limitations on the inclusion of senior unsubordinated debt in their latest capital initiatives

Smyth & Co's Jonathan Cary and Robert Rhoda explain why counterparties are resorting to alternative venues to resolve disputes under the ISDA Master Agreement

Jay Lee of Simmons & Simmons explains why new Safe rules permitting guarantees for offshore offerings may change how the popular support mechanism is used

Outbound investment soared last year. Several government initiatives – including the Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank – mean 2015 could see even more activity

The Libor scandal fundamentally changed global regulatory enforcement. As Cleary Gottlieb's Jonathan Kelly explains, today, institutions are increasingly being deputised to police themselves