IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,689 results that match your search.25,689 results
  • Freehills is pushing ahead with plans to expand its Vietnamese focus after hiring the former head of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer's Ho Chi Minh City office.
  • US lawyers have given a cautious welcome to the US Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) plans to radically reform corporate disclosure rules in the wake of the Enron affair.
  • With the new Basle capital accord due by the end of the year, the committee has turned its attention to securitization and issued a working paper discussing risk sensitive and ratings-based approaches. Mark Nicolaides and Emma Dmitriev of Mayer Brown Rowe and Maw, London, review the implications
  • The European Commission may have published a report on the need for an EU takeover directive and company law, but Germany is just getting used to its own new takeover rules. Daniela Weber-Rey and Wolfgang Richter of Clifford Chance Pünder, Frankfurt, examine what the regime means for companies while the European debate rumbles on
  • In a recent decision, the Ontario Securities Commission(OSC) "killed the pill" put in place by coffee shop chain Second Cup to block the hostile takeover bid by Cara Operations.
  • The Superintendency of Securities has issued resolution 0933 dated December 21 2001, which provides the new applicable framework for the public offering of securities in Colombia issued by multilateral credit entities. Before the enactment of this resolution, offerings undertaken by multilateral credit entities had the same applicable regime as ordinary foreign entities (ie foreign corporations and financial institutions). In accordance with the new regulation, this type of offering has much simpler requirements. An automatic approval process has been established, provided that the multilateral credit entity complies with the general requirements established below.
  • On October 11 2001, the House of Lords handed down judgment on eight appeals relating to claims by banks for possession of marital homes under mortgage. In each case the security was granted by a wife to secure her husband's debts. The wives were claiming that the security was unenforceable because they had signed under the undue influence of their husbands.
  • Whether it is by means of a corporate acquisition, the formation of a joint venture or the creation of a Mexican subsidiary or branch, foreign enterprises doing business in Mexico always face the need to send foreign nationals to oversee their investments or operations in Mexico. The economic slowdown has now brought the need for some of these entities to lay off or reduce the workforce of their business ventures in Mexico. This has raised a very significant issue as to whether or not the foreign expatriates are entitled to severance payments under the labour laws of Mexico. Although the Mexican labour laws are federal in nature, the labour courts are local and do not form part of the judiciary, but rather of the state or local executive branch. Their decisions are not public or published and, unless this issue is taken by means of constitutional review to the federal circuit courts, there is no possibility of looking for a court precedent. In fact, even if a circuit court takes a particular view on the topic, such a precedent is, in general terms, not binding on any other circuit courts within the country. We have not found any circuit court precedent that may give some guidelines on the issue at stake. As surprising as it may seem, foreign expatriates rendering services in Mexico on account of foreign companies have been opting to sue in the Mexican labour courts against: (i) the Mexican entity; and (ii) the foreign parent and/or sister entity, claiming severance payments under the labour laws of Mexico.
  • A new law was introduced on June 21 2001 to regulate international arbitration proceedings in Turkey. The new International Arbitration Law No 4686 is a supplement to the existing domestic arbitration regulation, which is set out in the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP). The Arbitration Law was enacted in parallel with the general trend towards liberalization of international arbitration legislation globally.
  • A provision of the Bank of Italy dated November 31 2002 has finally set out rules for authorization to trade in units of common investment funds not established pursuant to the relevant EU regulation (including Directive 85/611/EEC relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities, the so-called UCITS Directive). These are referred to as non-harmonized funds.