IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,695 results that match your search.25,695 results
  • Auditors play only a small role in keeping a company honest. But in a bid to reassure investors after a spate of corporate scandals, the Australian government is wrongly limiting its reforms to the audit function, says Alison Lansley of Mallesons Stephen Jaques
  • China Motor Bus Company recently used new tactics to beat off a hostile takeover from Asia Time Investments. Nick Rees and Christopher Walker, of Linklaters in Hong Kong, reveal the lessons to be learnt from an unusual bid
  • The past six months have seen the successful completion of the first rated collateralized fund obligations. Shlomo Twerski, Paul Watterson and David Nissenbaum of Schulte Roth & Zabel explain how to structure this new financial product
  • On November 29 2002 the Mexican government published new regulations applicable to institutional investment funds (afores) (Consar 15-8). These regulations are a result of new government policies towards promoting the growth of the institutional investment industry.
  • The nature of the payments abroad to non-residents or non-domiciled foreign entities determines the applicable income and remittance tax withholding in Colombia. This applies at a rate of 7% in the case of dividends, of 10% in the case of technical assistance, technical services and consulting services, and 39.55% in the case of financial earnings, commissions, fees, and royalties.
  • On July 14 2002 the Turkish Competition Board issued a new communiqué, mainly in line with the European Commission Block Exemption Regulation, on the group exemption of vertical agreements, replacing previous communiqués on group exemptions of exclusive distribution agreements, exclusive purchasing agreements and franchise agreements. Agreements benefiting from the previous group exemption communiqués must now comply with the provisions of the new communiqué by July 14 2003 to be exempted from the application of the relevant article of the Law on Protection of Competition regarding the prohibition of concerted practices resulting in the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition in a market for goods and services.
  • In connection with the bankruptcy of a regional savings and loan association at the beginning of the 1990s, a whole string of problems under the Swiss law governing the liquidation and capital reconstruction of banks came to light. The Swiss Federal Council has now proposed to parliament a revision of the law that would create a capital reconstruction and liquidation proceeding tailored to individual cases and would also coordinate the areas of capital reconstruction and liquidation with bank supervision. The new law would place all three areas under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Swiss Federal Bank Commission (SFBC).
  • In recent years and under prevailing conditions on the Swedish stock market, many companies have initiated discussions on adjusting the terms and conditions of various types of option programmes to restore an effective incentive for the participating employees. These discussions involve adjusted strike or subscription prices, extended exercise or subscription periods or other, less comprehensive, adjustments of a purely technical or editorial nature. This will, of course, give rise to a number of considerations.
  • Spain's new Law 44/2002 on Reform Measures of the Financial System - in which many surprises can be found - has finally been issued. It was published on November 23 in the Spanish Official Gazette (BOE no 281). Except for matters specified in Final Disposition number 3 (Disposición Final 3ª), the bulk of the Law is enforceable from the day after publication.
  • The Hungarian Supreme Court has issued a second judgement (BH 2002.364) confirming that assignments by way of security do not survive the assignor's insolvency. Although Supreme Court judgements are not binding as precedent, two recent judgements on this issue cast considerable doubt on the effectiveness of existing methods of taking security over rights and claims.