IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,698 results that match your search.25,698 results
  • Douglas Bartner, Michael Bosco, James Garrity and Stacey Spevak of Shearman & Sterling explain how Grapes became the first foreign company with minimal assets in the US to achieve restructuring under Chapter 11
  • In a recent case, a company domiciled and taxable in France owned the entire share capital of a company domiciled in Geneva. The Swiss subsidiary was solely set up to hold and administer securities and as such benefited from the so-called holding company privilege, a favourable tax status accorded by both the Federal and Cantonal tax laws. However, under the French Tax Code, section 209B (Controlled Foreign Company Rules or CFC rules), a French company's share in the income of a company domiciled abroad, in which the former holds a participation either of 10% or more or with a value of at least €22.8 million ($24.3 million), is added, for tax purposes, to its domestic (French) income, provided that the foreign company enjoys a privileged tax treatment at its domicile.
  • The understandable haste of Asian governments to create insolvency frameworks to revitalize their post-1997 economies has created as many problems as it has solved. Robert Zafft of the OECD and Lampros Vassiliou of Allens Arthur Robinson explain
  • The Shoura Council, a highly influential consultative group made up of some of the leading Saudi Arabian nationals, has rejected a proposed 10% income tax on foreign individuals. While, Saudi Arabia levies corporate taxes, it has traditionally not levied an individual income tax on expatriate workers. However, the country was considering levying a tax on expatriates as a means of reducing public debt and reducing the number of foreign workers in the hope that unemployed Saudi Arabian nationals would replace them.
  • Italy's regions, provinces, municipalities and other local entities can now securitize proceeds derived from the divestment of real estate assets under Law No 289 (December 27 2002). These territorial entities have become equal, in this respect, to the central government, which can finalize this kind of transaction under Law Decree No 351 (September 25 2001) as converted with amendments into Law No 419 (November 23 2001). For more details see IFLR, International briefings, January 2002.
  • In a significant development for Georgian tax legislation, the president of Georgia on April 19 2002 approved instructions outlining detailed procedures for the registration of taxpayers and the maintenance of a tax registry at district, zonal and regional levels (Decree 155). The instructions include forms to be filled out at the time of registration, reorganization or liquidation, and call for the collection of extensive information on taxpayers.
  • Recent corporate scandals in the US and related discussions concerning the independence and integrity of analysts and their investment research have led to similar discussions in Finland. This article provides a brief overview of the Finnish rules and regulations applicable to investment research.
  • Japanese legal procedures relating to insolvency are undergoing substantial reform. As a part of these reforms, many amendments to the Corporate Reorganization Law were promulgated on December 13 2002 and are scheduled to take effect on April 1 2003. The pre-amendment Corporate Reorganization Law provided a very rigid reorganization procedure, especially for large-scale companies with many creditors, employees and other stakeholders. The main purposes of the amendments are to create a swift reorganization procedure for companies and to establish more flexible reorganizing measures.
  • According to a new notice recently promulgated in China, even if the capital contribution of all foreign investors of an enterprise is lower than 25% of the enterprise's registered capital, the approval and registration procedures of that enterprise will be the same as those of a foreign-invested enterprise (FIE). However, such an enterprise cannot enjoy the preferential tax arrangement that FIEs enjoy. If the investor pays its contribution in cash, it must pay off its capital contribution within three months after the business licence is issued. If the investor makes its contribution in kind, it must pay off its capital contribution within six months.
  • In December, Time magazine ran an article called the Must Lunch List, profiling 10 of the most powerful behind-the-scenes actors in Europe's increasingly integrated economy. One of the 10 was Jaap Winter, the former legal adviser to Unilever and leading corporate governance specialist who chairs the EU's High Level Group of Company Law Experts.