IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,700 results that match your search.25,700 results
  • The Lamfalussy process will fail and the creation of a centralized European Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is inevitable, according to a new paper on the future of European securities regulation.
  • Ben Maiden reports from New York on moves to tackle investor concerns over mutual and hedge funds
  • To cope with commercial crimes in Hong Kong, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) recently published proposed revisions to the existing Guidance Note on Money Laundering for public consultation.
  • As part of the reforms of the securities settlement system, a securities clearing institution (Shoken Torihiki Seisan Kikan) has been created under an amendment to the Securities and Exchange Law, which took effect on January 6 2003. A securities clearing institution means a central counterparty with respect to securities transactions, which enables securities transactions between the buyer(s) and seller(s) to be cleared in one block. A primary purpose of the securities clearing institution is to lessen the settlement risk with respect to securities transactions.
  • In a strongly worded January 2003 report, the US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations stated that, by the end of this year, the SEC and US bank regulators should take action to preclude abusive structured finance transactions. The report applauds the use of structured finance to lower funding costs and diversify risk (true asset securitizations) but virtually demands the termination of false liability securitizations. False securitizations attenuate risk and hide assets and liabilities from investor and regulatory scrutiny.
  • The Cayman Islands has always been responsive to the needs of the international financial community in introducing expedient legislation. Last year saw the creation of the segregated portfolio company (SPC) by way of amendment to the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands, and now revisions in 2003 will make it a more attractive corporate vehicle for mutual funds and multi-issuer structured finance vehicles. Provisions that have caused difficulties in obtaining a rating for structured finance deals will be removed and a mechanism introduced to enable any existing Cayman Islands company to convert into an SPC. The key points are described below.
  • An increasing number of Canadian issuers have steered away from fixed price bids recently and opted for an auction tender process, or so-called Dutch auction, when completing substantial issuer bids. The Dutch auction issuer bid model has been further modified by issuers and investment dealers as a technique to distribute public offerings of securities and, most recently, has also been used by investors seeking to acquire shares in public issuers.
  • Rules requiring companies to report Gaap equivalents to their non-Gaap numbers could bury useful information among confusing detail and discourage management from providing certain data in SEC filings. It may be investors who suffer, says David Bernstein, of Clifford Chance, New York
  • Proposals in Japan to allow the use of foreign company shares in stock-for-stock deals with domestic entities are likely to fail because the government will not remove prohibitive tax burdens. Philip Quirk, head of legal at Morgan Stanley in Japan, reviews the developments
  • Seven months after Sarbanes-Oxley was passed, Jay Clayton, Richard Morrissey and Jack Bostelman of Sullivan & Cromwell look at how the SEC has addressed some of the concerns of non-US issuers affected by its new rules