IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,886 results that match your search.25,886 results
  • Kathy Hughes of Slaughter and May focuses on aspects of the new pension statutory framework that impact on M&A transactions
  • By Alan Montgomery of Herbert Smith
  • Swiss legal reform aims to make the country more competitive in the international investment fund market. Philippe Borens, Lionel Aeschlimann and Mark-Oliver Baumgarten of Schellenberg Wittmer outline the changes
  • Niall Horgan of Matheson Ormsby Prentice outlines some of the considerations in lending to Irish-domiciled, regulated investment funds
  • Péter Bálint of Bán S Szabó & Partners gives an overview of fund management in Hungary
  • Fund management is an ideal vehicle to direct billions of domestic savings towards Chinese companies, and China is adjusting its regulatory framework towards this end. Raphaël Chantelot and David Boitout of Gide Loyrette Nouel explain
  • Christian Kremer and Caroline Migeot of Kremer Associés & Clifford Chance focus on the eligibility of derivative instruments on financial indices for investment by harmonized Ucits
  • By Malcolm Lombers, Stephen Wilkinson, James Quinney and Alison Brown of Herbert Smith
  • Online UK property marketplace Rightmove completed its £425 million ($744 million) initial public offering (IPO). The company listed on the London Stock Exchange on March 15 and is reported to be investing ahead of changes to UK property law that bring in mandatory buyers' information packs in June 2007. Rightmove's website is the UK's largest property portal. Herbert Smith, through lead partner Greg Mulley, advised sponsor and sole bookrunner UBS on the deal. Slaughter and May advised Rightmove and Addleshaw Goddard advised the selling shareholders.
  • An arbitrator who knows the parties well, being intimately involved in their relationship and difficulties, can be valuable. Knowledge of the problem and business might lead to a more commercially correct award than that rendered by a disinterested party. However, should this intimate arbitrator decide on issues relating to his own jurisdiction?