IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,962 results that match your search.25,962 results
  • The establishment of IILM's short-term sukuk programme gives shariah-compliant financial institutions an new option for liquidity management
  • Consortium - Laclé & Gutierrez
  • Contrary to what's been widely reported by other media changes to the frontier's controversial FDI law may not make a difference to foreign investors
  • Companies increasingly favour JVs when pursuing M&A. But while such partnerships have proved an effective way to reignite activity in a depressed market, many don’t fully understand the risks involved
  • Market opinion is sharply divided on whether Cyprus’s favourable holding company regime is ringfenced from the effects of its banking crisis. It’s a critical question for Russia’s multi-billion dollar private M&A sector
  • Kerem Turunç of TURUNÇ describes the new securities regulation taking shape in Turkey
  • Freddy Karyadi Oene Marseille Indonesia's Capital Market and Financial Institutions Supervisory Agency (Bapepam-LK) has recently issued Decree No KEP-716/BL/2012 on Investor Protection Fund Organisers. It includes details on Organisers stipulated under the Decree's Appendix, Rule VI.A.5 on Investor Protection Fund Organisers. Decree 716 is a follow up to Decree 715, which establishes an Investor Protection Fund. In order to operate as an Organiser, a party must secure a business licence from Bapepam-LK. This can be obtained by submitting Form VI.A.5-1 along with the required documents as stated in Paragraph 13(a) of Decree 716. Bapepam-LK will either approve or deny the application.
  • On December 25 2012, the Financial Services Agency of Japan (FSA) published a report titled Development of Systems Concerning Insider Trading Regulation Based on Recent Violations and Financial and Corporate Practices. The report summarises the problems with the present insider trading regulations in Japan and presents recommended revisions. The present insider trading regulations in Japan are expected to be reformed based on the recommendations presented by the report in the future.
  • Banji Adenusi With private equity (PE) transactions in Africa now grossing an excess of $1 billion each year and growing, it is no surprise that the regulators are turning their spotlight on the sector to prevent abuse. Most recently, Nigeria's Securities and Exchange Commission brought out specific rules to govern the operations of private equity funds in Nigeria. This demonstrates the Commission's recognition of the growing importance of PE funds in driving investments in the country, especially considering the buoyancy of sectors such as telecoms, healthcare and real estate. It is furthermore a recognition of the management of the operational and investment risks associated with these funds – underscoring the need for a robust risk assessment and management framework for investment advisers. The rules apply to PE funds established in Nigeria with a minimum commitment of N1 billion ($6.3 million) of investors' funds; the funds are restricted to sourcing investments from qualified investors alone (Rule 249(d)(4)). The revised rules impose a minimum capital requirement of N20 million on PE fund managers, which is justified on the basis of the risk exposure of the fund. This capital requirement is a fair cap, especially when juxtaposed with the EU directive on the regulation of private equity (the Alternative Investment Fund Managers or AIFM Directive), which imposes a capital requirement of €125,000 ($164,000) for external managers of funds and €300,000 for a fund manager that is an internally managed fund. The AIFM Directive also requires, however, that the manager provide additional funds equal to 0.02% of the amount by which the value of the portfolios exceed €250 million.
  • Seda Akipek and Müjdem Aksoy of Cerrahoglu examine the implications of changes to Turkey’s Commercial Code which allow for electronic company meetings