IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,871 results that match your search.25,871 results
  • The Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency has issued a contract of guarantee to a Chinese investor for the first time. The move is expected to be a boost for projects in frontier markets
  • IFLR's coverage of regulatory changes to EU and UK bank structures features in-depth analysis and expert opinion on the reforms' legal and systemic implications
  • Reporting requirements to be imposed on private funds looking to take advantage of their new marketing rights negate some of the benefits of last week’s general solicitation changes
  • This month's market poll asks whether US plans to impose leverage ratios double the level mandated by Basel III will embolden European regulators
  • Feihe International’s recent take-private was the first to include a placeholder loan, and is an example for the growing number of small US-listed ChinaCos going private
  • The legality of variable interest entities (VIEs) in China is even more uncertain following unfavourable rulings in China’s highest court and a tribunal of the Chinese International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission Shanghai
  • A drastic but little-noticed change to US tender offer rules means from next month it will be significantly easier for private equity sponsors to takeover US-listed companies
  • Asian lenders’ increasing activity abroad may signal a growing role for project bonds in the region. Here's why
  • Counsel on 2013’s first European commercial mortgage-backed securitisations have warned the deals do not necessarily signal a broader market revival
  • Mian Muhammad Nazir Derivatives are one of the most important techniques that financial institutions employ to manage certain risks. However, the ability of Islamic financial institutions (IFIs) to benefit from financial derivatives for risk mitigation purposes is limited as many of the conventional derivatives, in their current form and substance, do not align with the principles of shariah. Many IFIs use shariah-compliant alternatives of most of the financial derivatives in accordance with the guidance of their shariah boards. These alternatives appear to meet the shariah requirements in respect of the form; nonetheless, there remain many issues from the substance perspective that need to be considered seriously in order to have a clear and uniform position throughout the system of Islamic banking, sooner rather than later. Simpler forms of financial derivatives that aim to serve purely as risk mitigation techniques can easily be transformed into shariah-compliant instruments with a wider shariah acceptability. However, some of the more complex and exotic derivatives (particularly credit-linked notes) that entail a dominant financial gain with a possibility of excessive risk will certainly be viewed as instruments breaching shariah principles which prohibit speculation, gambling and so on. Such instruments are not purely for risk mitigation purposes. The ability of IFIs to benefit from such instruments will certainly raise questions and hence affect the overall credibility of Islamic banking and finance, which so far has narrowly escaped the negative effect of such products due to the absence of shariah clearance from the shariah boards.