CYPRUS: The term “protective measures” contained in Section 9 of the International Commercial Arbitration Law (L. 101/87), does not give jurisdiction to Cypriot Courts to issue anti-suit injunctions in aid of international arbitral cases

IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


CYPRUS: The term “protective measures” contained in Section 9 of the International Commercial Arbitration Law (L. 101/87), does not give jurisdiction to Cypriot Courts to issue anti-suit injunctions in aid of international arbitral cases

Sponsored by

soteris-pittas-co-cyprus_1_.png

BRIEFING: Limassol, 6 December, 2018

In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of Cyprus issued a prerogative order of Certiorari and quashed and cancelled a draconian anti-suit injunction issued by a district court, in aid of pending LCIA arbitral proceedings.

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 9 of the Law 101/87 (which has adopted the Uncitral Model Law in Cyprus) and ruled that the term “protective measures”, appearing in Section 9, does not include or cover anti-suit injunctions and consequently Cypriot Courts do not have jurisdiction, on the basis of Section 9 of the Law 101/87, to grant anti-suit injunctions.

Our lawfirm acted for the successful applicant to the Certiorari proceedings.


 

For further information on this topic please contact

Mr. Soteris Pittas (spittas@pittaslegal.com) at SOTERIS PITTAS & CO LLC,

by telephone (+357 25 028460) or by fax (+357 25 028461)

 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advise should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Gift this article