The Cyprus intellectual property rights "box" – a limited-time opportunity

IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


The Cyprus intellectual property rights "box" – a limited-time opportunity

Sponsored by

Elias Neocleous & Co LLC

Philippos Aristotelous of Andreas Neocleous & Co looks at intellectual property rights tax incentives

3282.png

Philippos Aristotelous of Andreas Neocleous & Co looks at intellectual property rights tax incentives in Cyprus

Background

In May 2012 Cyprus introduced a package of incentives and tax exemptions relating to investment in intellectual property rights, commonly known as an intellectual property rights box (“IP box”).

Intellectual property projects lend themselves to cross-border planning by reason of the mobility of intellectual property rights, which do not consist of physical assets and so can be easily moved between different jurisdictions and tax systems according to prevailing circumstances.

Comparison with other European IP box regimes

The table below summarises the key aspects:

 

Cyprus

Belgium

France

Hungary

Luxembourg

Netherlands

Spain

UK

Effective tax rate

2.50%

6.80%

15%

9.50%

5.76%

5%

15%

10%

Qualifying IP assets

All IP assets, including patents, trademarks, copyright, formulas, designs, knowhow and processes. 

Patents and supplementary patent certificates. 

Patents, extensions, patentable inventions and industrial fabrication processes

Patents, know-how, trademarks, business names, know-how and copyrights

Patents, trademarks, designs, domain names, models and software copyrights

Self-developed IP relating to patents or approved R&D.

Patents, formulas, processes, plans, models, designs and know-how

UK and European patents, supplementary protection certificates and plant variety rights 

Ineligible IP assets

None

Know-how, trademarks, designs, models, formulas or processes

Acquired IP rights held for less than two years

None

Know-how, formulas, copyrights (other than software)

Trademarks and brands Acquired IP

Trademarks, copyrights of literary, artistic, or scientific work, including software

Trademarks, copyrights and designs

Internally developed or acquired?

Applies to both internally developed and acquired IP

Internally developed IP and improvements to acquired IP

Applies to both internally developed and acquired IP

Applies to both internally developed and acquired IP

Applies to both internally developed and acquired IP, but not IP acquired from a related party

Self-developed only

Self-developed only 

Self developed and “actively managed” (used in business) only

Limitations on where R&D takes place

None

Some

None

None

None

Some

Some

None

Qualifying revenue

All income, including compensation for breach of rights

Patent income 

Royalties net of cost of managing qualifying IP

Royalties

Royalties net of costs (amortization, R&D costs, interest etc)

Net income from qualifying assets

Gross income from qualifying assets

Net income from qualifying IP

Deduction rate

80%

80%

None – reduced tax rate

50%

80%

None – reduced tax rate

50%

None – reduced tax rate

Overall limit of deduction

None

100% of pre-tax income 

None

50% of pre-tax income

None

None

Six times the cost of developing the IP

None

Gains on disposal included

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

 

While the French, Hungarian, Luxembourg, Netherlands and United Kingdom schemes offer partial exemption of gains on disposal, the exemptions are less attractive than those provided by the Cyprus scheme, due to limitations on qualifying assets and less generous deduction rates. Furthermore, full exemption can be relatively easily obtained in Cyprus by holding the IP assets in a separate company and disposing of the shares in the company rather than the IP itself, taking advantage of Cyprus’s extensive capital gains tax exemptions.

In most comparisons of the benefits offered by different jurisdictions there is a trade-off to be made. One jurisdiction will be better on certain aspects, but another will be better on others, and the differences will have to be assessed and weighed against one another to arrive at the best overall solution. In the case of the IP box regime there is no need for this, as Cyprus is the clear leader on every single aspect.

In most cases immediate economic and tax savings can be accomplished by transferring intellectual rights currently held by entities located in low or no tax jurisdictions to Cyprus resident companies in order to take advantage of the new exemptions. The transfer of IP rights into a Cyprus company will not attract any form of taxation in Cyprus and the new benefits and substantial exemptions will become available as soon as the asset is transferred.

The Cyprus IP box provides attractive opportunities for structuring the exploitation of IP assets through Cyprus and in particular through the use of Cyprus-resident IP owners, especially in conjunction with Cyprus's extensive network of double tax treaties, under which withholding tax on royalty income is either eliminated altogether or substantially reduced.

There has been considerable opposition from some countries to the introduction of “intellectual property box” regimes and as part of the G20/OECD base erosion and profit shifting project a number of countries, including Germany, put forward what has become known as a “modified nexus” approach. This approach seeks to ensure that preferential regimes for intellectual property require substantial economic activities to be undertaken in the jurisdiction concerned, by requiring tax benefits to be connected directly to R&D expenditures within the jurisdiction.

Now that broad agreement has been reached on the modified nexus approach there is only limited time to enter into the Cyprus scheme, since it and all similar schemes will be closed to new entrants from June 2016. However, companies that join the scheme before then can look forward to benefiting from substantial savings until mid-2021. All that is required is to establish a suitable Cyprus structure for holding IP and transferring the business’s intangible assets into it.

We therefore recommend any business with significant IP assets or income to examine the option of benefitting from the favourable Cyprus IP taxation regime.


 

Philippos Aristotelous

Andreas Neocleous & Co

Limassol

Gift this article