In-house agree on risks of central clearing

Elizabeth Fournier | NEWS ANALYSIS - February 02, 2010

Instead of controlling and mitigating risk, forcing derivatives through central counterparties (CCP) could exacerbate risk in the system, creating a delicate structure that really is too big to fail.

That was the opinion of a panel of in-house bankers’ counsel, speaking at the PLI conference on Securities Regulation in Europe last week.

“Central clearing is not a panacea that removes systemic risk from the market,” said Simon Dodds, general counsel at Deutsche Bank in London. “It centralises and concentrates risk so that the central counterparty truly is too big to fail.”...




Web seminars

US regulatory reform
August 3 2010
The impact of US regulatory reform on foreign financial institutions and issuers. A discussion with UBS, Morrison & Foerster and IFLR

Latest Issue

September 2010

Avoiding the circular
China-based companies are moving away from Circular 10 when listing abroad. New work-around structures are emerging [more]