Private practice response: Morrison & Foerster: Don't rely on models

Author: | Published: 1 Jun 2009

Elizabeth Fournier
Staff writer

No one will ever know whether Basel II could have mitigated the financial crisis, had it been implemented earlier. Respondents to the Bankers' Counsel Poll still seem to have confidence in it, supporting the Basel Committee's move to include stricter penalties for risky exposures. But private practice lawyers disagree.

James Tanenbaum, chair of the global capital markets practice at Morrison & Foerster, has lost confidence in any regulation that relies on modelling. Instead he says that tangible common equity (TCE) should be relied on as a test of banks' and companies' financial strength. He also thinks a global regulator is impossible and undesirable.

IFLR: Why does no one want a global regulator? James Tanenbaum: It's always difficult to develop much enthusiasm for anything that involves ceding a portion of a nation's sovereignty. That's what inevitably happens when you have a global regulatory authority. It's not feasible anyway, but even...

Upcoming events

  • 22feb

    Asia M&A Forum

    Island Shangri-La Hotel, Hong Kong February February 22-23 2012

Web seminars

Proposed US offering reforms
March 8, 2012
4.00 pm GMT