Bankers' Counsel Poll 2009

June 01, 2009


Bankers' counsel believe a single global regulator is both undesirable and impossible. They also think that the FSA has been the UK's biggest asset and that a return to Glass-Steagall would be a bad move. By Elizabeth Fournier

"A global system would be helpful, but it will never be possible to capture everything in a single system." The G20 proposals may have been well received in April, but in-house counsel at banks think it can't and shouldn't happen. The last 12 months have seen unprecedented turmoil, with not even the biggest financial institutions immune to government intervention, restructurings and internal reshuffles.

Despite this, participation in the annual IFLR Bankers' Counsel Poll was still high, though of course one or two familiar names were missing. Seventeen of the 20 biggest investment banks in the world agreed to take part, with some submitting multiple responses from different departments.

While 70% of respondents said they did not want a global regulator, and all agreed that the UK had benefited from having the FSA as its sole supervisor, some questions divided the banks. Counsel are split as to what is standing in...




It was an aggressive view, but it's good news for defendants in future subprime litigation

A US lawyer on the importance of the Fortis class action case

Web seminars

US and EU hybrid capital
February 3 2010
The future of hybrids, in a popular discussion between IFLR, Morrison & Foerster and Calyon

Latest Issue

March 2010

Basel III: The revenge of Basel
New Basel rules are affecting everyone differently. In the UK banks are worried about grandfathering, in Germany the headache is hybrids and in the US it's risk structures. Meanwhile Japan has some tips and Hong Kong structured its first hybrid [more]