US Spacs

Be careful with time limits

June 01, 2009


Getting Spacs more time for an acquisition can be tricky. Make sure you consider disclosure, authority and contractual issues

Spacs can be good exit alternatives for portfolio companies of private equity and hedge-fund investors due to their unique structure and limitations, especially given the chilled IPO and credit markets. However, these unique structures and limitations also lead to issues for a Spac that is running out of time.

There are different ways to solve these issues, depending on risk tolerance, but they should be explored and negotiated before executing the merger agreement. By discussing them early and openly in the negotiation of the merger agreement, a portfolio company should be able to avoid any surprises and create a successful business combination with a Spac.

Becoming a viable route With SEC approval of the listing rule changes on July 25 2008 for Nasdaq and on May 6 2008 for the NYSE allowing both to list special purpose acquisition companies (Spacs), and the listing of high-profile Spacs since late 2007, including Liberty...




"The culture is not to disclose. And that’s partly driven by the rules"

The SFC's Martin Wheatley on the problem of disclosure in Hong Kong

Web seminars

US and EU hybrid capital
February 3 2010
The future of hybrids, in a popular discussion between IFLR, Morrison & Foerster and Calyon

Latest Issue

March 2010

Basel III: The revenge of Basel
New Basel rules are affecting everyone differently. In the UK banks are worried about grandfathering, in Germany the headache is hybrids and in the US it's risk structures. Meanwhile Japan has some tips and Hong Kong structured its first hybrid [more]