Give Basel II a chance

December 01, 2008


It would have helped prevent the credit crunch, and we haven’t begun to see what it can do

Basel II set up rigorous risk and capital management requirements designed to ensure that a bank holds capital reserves appropriate to the risk it exposes itself to through its lending and investment practices. The greater risk a bank has, the greater the amount of capital it needs to hold to safeguard its solvency and overall stability.

The final version of Basel II seeks to:

  • ensure that capital allocation is more risk sensitive;
  • separate operational risk from credit risk and quantify both; and
  • align economic and regulatory capital more closely to reduce the scope for regulatory arbitrage.

Though the final Accord has largely addressed the regulatory arbitrage issue, there are still areas where regulatory capital requirements will diverge from the economics. Basel II has left largely untouched the question of how to actually define bank capital, which diverges from accounting equity in important respects.

Basel II (effective March 2008) required, among...



It’s not as simple as waving a cheque for HK$1 million and saying: ‘I want some shares’

Teresa Ma, of Linklaters, on retail investor restrictions for Rusal's listing

Web seminars

US and EU hybrid capital
February 3 2010
The future of hybrids, in a popular discussion between IFLR, Morrison & Foerster and Calyon

Latest Issue

March 2010

Basel III: The revenge of Basel
New Basel rules are affecting everyone differently. In the UK banks are worried about grandfathering, in Germany the headache is hybrids and in the US it's risk structures. Meanwhile Japan has some tips and Hong Kong structured its first hybrid [more]