Unusual 'Mac' clause saves TPG

August 01, 2008


Plus all the news analysis from the rest of the month

Unusual 'Mac' clause saves TPG

Underwriters can't throw their toys out too often

TPG Capital's withdrawal from buying a stake in Bradford & Bingley relied on a specifically drafted termination clause. Its targeted nature demonstrates how these clauses are being used as specific break-up weapons.

"When you get specific with Macs (material adverse change clauses), it is easier to see where the trigger point is," said a partner close to the deal. "Here, TPG could walk away if Bradford & Bingley's credit rating fell by two notches. Everyone could see when that had happened and there was no debate – TPG was free to go."

The clause in question was technically a specific termination event, not a Mac. Both types of clause are usually drafted next to each other in contracts which is why termination clauses are often called Macs when they are not.

TPG entered negotiations with Bradford & Bingley...




The regulators haven’t mitigated counterparty risk yet, just changed it

Simon Dodds, general counsel at Deutsche Bank, on forcing derivatives through central counterparties

Web seminars

US and EU hybrid capital
February 3 2010
The future of hybrids, in a popular discussion between IFLR, Morrison & Foerster and Calyon

Latest Issue

March 2010

Basel III: The revenge of Basel
New Basel rules are affecting everyone differently. In the UK banks are worried about grandfathering, in Germany the headache is hybrids and in the US it's risk structures. Meanwhile Japan has some tips and Hong Kong structured its first hybrid [more]