What MyTravel means for bondholders

March 01, 2005


The timeframe imposed on the MyTravel restructuring by regulatory considerations forced the company to take a tough line with bondholders. William Underhill and Caroline Edwards report

In the restructuring of MyTravel, completed at the end of 2004, bondholders challenged the company's right to pursue a scheme of arrangement without their agreement. The MyTravel restructuring presented the difficulties that arise when competing interests have to be balanced in a complex restructuring involving numerous creditor groups. In this case, the usual problems were compounded by the contraints of a regulated business. This had two important implications: time was limited, with an absolute cut-off after which the regulator was expected to act; and the consequence if the regulator did act would would be an immediate and irremediable loss of value for all creditors. The process was therefore shorter than would normally be the case for a restructuring of this complexity - less than three months from the first formal proposal to creditors to completion. The other notable result was that the borrower resorted to a court process to bring bondholders reluctantly to accept the allocation of equity initially proposed....



It's much more efficient in terms of regulatory capital. But it's mad how big they have become

A UK partner reacts to banks' use of derivatives to fund acquisitions

Web seminars

US and EU hybrid capital
February 3 2010
The future of hybrids, in a popular discussion between IFLR, Morrison & Foerster and Calyon

Latest Issue

March 2010

Basel III: The revenge of Basel
New Basel rules are affecting everyone differently. In the UK banks are worried about grandfathering, in Germany the headache is hybrids and in the US it's risk structures. Meanwhile Japan has some tips and Hong Kong structured its first hybrid [more]